Tag Archives: proState
State v. Luman
Decided by the Supreme Court on December 31, 2009. In something of a companion case to Heckathorne, the Court held that a shopowner did not have a privacy interest in illegally-recorded survelliance tapes because the tapes were turned over to … Continue reading
State v. Heckathorne
[This is one of many case summaries I hope to write about relevant criminal cases decided by the Oregon Court of Appeals and Oregon Supreme Court.] In State v. Heckathorne, decided by the Supreme Court on December 31, 2009, the … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 2009, proState, smell test, Suppression, Supreme Court
Leave a comment